<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>the editman.com</title>
    <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/</link>
    <description>Things I like!</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>editman</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:41:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>editman@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>editman@hotmail.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=0990d33e-df0a-4dc8-a7ca-c24e785a3b29</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,0990d33e-df0a-4dc8-a7ca-c24e785a3b29.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/V-LCD56MD.jpg" border="0" />
        <br />
        <br />
I had a 70XP monitor from Marshall and it served me well when I did all work with
a Canon 7D. Now Marshall has a new line of monitors and one in particular caught my
interest - V-LCD56MD. A 5.6 inch high resolution IPS monitor with some very useful
features using 1280x800 pixels on screen.<br /><br />
First off it has both SDI and HDMI inputs and outputs. The SDI input can be exchanged
so that instead of SDI in/out you have two SDI outputs converted from the HDMI input.
There's a WFM and audio meter on screen and a headphone output. 1:1 pixel zoom with
moveable area. False colours and all of the usual great features on Marshall monitors.<br /><br />
5.6" is to me a perfect size to put nearby a camera so this one suits me fine but
you can also get a 7" or 9" version with the same features.<br /><br />
Power drain is a little more than on the DP6 and it can be driven by Sony NP batteries
or batteries from Panasonic or Canon just like the older Marshall monitors. In front
of the screen is a protection screen. I'll try to get hold of a sample and look closer.<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=0990d33e-df0a-4dc8-a7ca-c24e785a3b29" /></body>
      <title>Interesting new monitors from Marshall</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,0990d33e-df0a-4dc8-a7ca-c24e785a3b29.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/18/InterestingNewMonitorsFromMarshall.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/V-LCD56MD.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I had a 70XP monitor from Marshall and it served me well when I did all work with
a Canon 7D. Now Marshall has a new line of monitors and one in particular caught my
interest - V-LCD56MD. A 5.6 inch high resolution IPS monitor with some very useful
features using 1280x800 pixels on screen.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First off it has both SDI and HDMI inputs and outputs. The SDI input can be exchanged
so that instead of SDI in/out you have two SDI outputs converted from the HDMI input.
There's a WFM and audio meter on screen and a headphone output. 1:1 pixel zoom with
moveable area. False colours and all of the usual great features on Marshall monitors.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
5.6" is to me a perfect size to put nearby a camera so this one suits me fine but
you can also get a 7" or 9" version with the same features.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Power drain is a little more than on the DP6 and it can be driven by Sony NP batteries
or batteries from Panasonic or Canon just like the older Marshall monitors. In front
of the screen is a protection screen. I'll try to get hold of a sample and look closer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=0990d33e-df0a-4dc8-a7ca-c24e785a3b29" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Monitor</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=9b0dcff2-6dd5-4af9-a628-4d985f0a68e4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,9b0dcff2-6dd5-4af9-a628-4d985f0a68e4.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2858.jpg" border="0" height="436" width="640" />
        <br />
        <br />
Sometimes you have to use HDMI from cameras or other sources but HDMI and very often
mini HDMI doesn't feel to comfortable to use. One solution is to converter the signal
into something more robust like HD SDI before running longer cables or attaching monitors
and such. In these circumstances a device like Blackmagicdesign Battery Converter
can come in handy.<br /><br />
I got a HDMI to SDI converter and Blackmagic has SDI to HDMI converters if that's
what you want.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2860.jpg" border="0" height="342" width="640" /><br /><br />
This device is very easy to use. At one end is a HDMI input, a DC power jack and a
switch to toggle between battery operation and no battery operation. Thanks to the
built in rechargeable battery you can run it up to two hours. When the unit is hooked
up to 12V DC power the battery is charged at the same time as you use it. If the DC
plug falls out the battery insures that this converter will keep on running.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2859.jpg" border="0" height="291" width="640" /><br /><br />
At the other end there's two HD-SDI BNC connectors and a mini USB jack to upgrade
the unit if needed. The whole chassis feels excellent in built quality and it has
no rough edges. All connectors are recessed to avoid breaking of connectors. All in
all a sweet little device.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2862.jpg" border="0" height="521" width="640" /><br /><br />
In each corner there's rubber feat to avoid slipping and a white LED near the switch
indicates how much charge is left inside. This is my first Blackmagicdesign product
and I really like the way it's put together from two aluminium pieces. According to
them it can even be run over by a truck but I wont try that. I hope their Cinema Camera
has the same feel to it!<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=9b0dcff2-6dd5-4af9-a628-4d985f0a68e4" /></body>
      <title>Blackmagicdesign Battery Converter</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,9b0dcff2-6dd5-4af9-a628-4d985f0a68e4.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/15/BlackmagicdesignBatteryConverter.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2858.jpg" border="0" height="436" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sometimes you have to use HDMI from cameras or other sources but HDMI and very often
mini HDMI doesn't feel to comfortable to use. One solution is to converter the signal
into something more robust like HD SDI before running longer cables or attaching monitors
and such. In these circumstances a device like Blackmagicdesign Battery Converter
can come in handy.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I got a HDMI to SDI converter and Blackmagic has SDI to HDMI converters if that's
what you want.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2860.jpg" border="0" height="342" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This device is very easy to use. At one end is a HDMI input, a DC power jack and a
switch to toggle between battery operation and no battery operation. Thanks to the
built in rechargeable battery you can run it up to two hours. When the unit is hooked
up to 12V DC power the battery is charged at the same time as you use it. If the DC
plug falls out the battery insures that this converter will keep on running.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2859.jpg" border="0" height="291" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
At the other end there's two HD-SDI BNC connectors and a mini USB jack to upgrade
the unit if needed. The whole chassis feels excellent in built quality and it has
no rough edges. All connectors are recessed to avoid breaking of connectors. All in
all a sweet little device.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2862.jpg" border="0" height="521" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In each corner there's rubber feat to avoid slipping and a white LED near the switch
indicates how much charge is left inside. This is my first Blackmagicdesign product
and I really like the way it's put together from two aluminium pieces. According to
them it can even be run over by a truck but I wont try that. I hope their Cinema Camera
has the same feel to it!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=9b0dcff2-6dd5-4af9-a628-4d985f0a68e4" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Monitor</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=e280df7c-2fb0-4263-949f-b59b1f9bda92</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,e280df7c-2fb0-4263-949f-b59b1f9bda92.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/42037594?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640">
        </iframe>
        <p>
          <br />
        </p>
I shot this BTS video from one of our commercial shoots, this time using an Arri Alexa
for the commercial spots. During the day I picked up audio and took care of files
coming out of the Alexa so I had plenty of time to do the BTS since I wasn't DP this
time.<br /><br />
My Canon 5Dmk3 was set to Technicolor profile 1080p25 IPB. Used a Canon EF 24-70/2.8
lens and Zacuto EVF to do the BTS video.<p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=e280df7c-2fb0-4263-949f-b59b1f9bda92" /></body>
      <title>BTS video using my Canon 5Dmk3</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,e280df7c-2fb0-4263-949f-b59b1f9bda92.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/13/BTSVideoUsingMyCanon5Dmk3.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 17:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/42037594?title=0&amp;amp;byline=0&amp;amp;portrait=0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640"&gt;
&lt;/iframe&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
I shot this BTS video from one of our commercial shoots, this time using an Arri Alexa
for the commercial spots. During the day I picked up audio and took care of files
coming out of the Alexa so I had plenty of time to do the BTS since I wasn't DP this
time.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My Canon 5Dmk3 was set to Technicolor profile 1080p25 IPB. Used a Canon EF 24-70/2.8
lens and Zacuto EVF to do the BTS video.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=e280df7c-2fb0-4263-949f-b59b1f9bda92" /&gt;</description>
      <category>5D mkIII</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=27858999-b190-4720-87ce-76138bffdc69</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,27858999-b190-4720-87ce-76138bffdc69.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/PP55.jpg" border="0" />
        <br />
        <br />
I shot a BTS video this week as my first real Canon 5Dmk3 video and struggled to get
Premiere CS5.5 to ingest the material. No matter how I tried some files hanged the
program and couldn't be imported. Some clips worked fine one time and the next it
was marked as offline. I found out there is an incompatibility issue between Canon
5Dmk3 files and Premiere 5.5.<br /><br />
Apparently files have to be renamed from .mov to .mpg to enable CS5.5 to import clips.
I used a small and excellent program called Extension changer and after changing files
to .mpg all of them imported just fine.<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=27858999-b190-4720-87ce-76138bffdc69" /></body>
      <title>Incompatibility between Canon 5Dmk3 files and Premiere 5.5</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,27858999-b190-4720-87ce-76138bffdc69.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/11/IncompatibilityBetweenCanon5Dmk3FilesAndPremiere55.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 23:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/PP55.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I shot a BTS video this week as my first real Canon 5Dmk3 video and struggled to get
Premiere CS5.5 to ingest the material. No matter how I tried some files hanged the
program and couldn't be imported. Some clips worked fine one time and the next it
was marked as offline. I found out there is an incompatibility issue between Canon
5Dmk3 files and Premiere 5.5.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Apparently files have to be renamed from .mov to .mpg to enable CS5.5 to import clips.
I used a small and excellent program called Extension changer and after changing files
to .mpg all of them imported just fine.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=27858999-b190-4720-87ce-76138bffdc69" /&gt;</description>
      <category>5D mkIII</category>
      <category>Editing</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=be0c0f46-3e5d-4318-8896-3486b7f9fd7f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,be0c0f46-3e5d-4318-8896-3486b7f9fd7f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/BMDCC.jpg" border="0" />
        <br />
        <br />
Yesterday I worked with a production crew making a couple of commercials and I picked
up audio and took care of files coming out of an Arri Alexa camera. This was my first
time working both in a production and in post with this camera and what comes out
of it.<br /><br />
The beauty of the Alexa is Prores 444 files that plays on any modern computer be it
win7 or OSX. It's such a great thing. No transcoding just straight into Premiere Pro
or After Effects. I asked the DP about shooting in RAW but he never do it, only to
PRORES and I understand from a post workflow standpoint that it's much more desirable
and cost effective than RED files or RAW files from the Alexa.<br /><br />
Looking at Blackmagics Cinema Camera due later this summer a couple of things are
shared between this camera and Arris Alexa. Both can shoot to RAW in higher than 2K
resolution or PRORES and both have a high dynamic range in the 13-14 stops class.
I also asked the DP about running audio into the Alexa but he never did that either.
I bet it's easier to get audio into the BMD Cinema Camera but it's also not a priority
it seems in the design of this camera.<br /><br />
With about the same DR and file format but in 10-bit 4:2:2 on the BMD camera I can
see these camera to look very similar in the edit suit. So it might turn out to be
a poor mans Alexa. Still, footage is lacking except from John Brawley and nobody knows
how easy or cumbersome it will be to shoot with.<br /><br />
The smaller sensor inside the BMD Cinema Camera wont achieve the same amount of shallow
DOF as the Alexa and it wont be as solid but for $2995 I can't see it to turn out
all wrong. Cropfactor compared to Super35 is 1.6. Here's sample footage to view and
I hope that we'll see more soon.<br /><br /><br /><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/40584879?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640"></iframe><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=be0c0f46-3e5d-4318-8896-3486b7f9fd7f" /></body>
      <title>BMD's Cinema Camera - a poor mans Alexa?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,be0c0f46-3e5d-4318-8896-3486b7f9fd7f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/10/BMDsCinemaCameraAPoorMansAlexa.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:54:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/BMDCC.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yesterday I worked with a production crew making a couple of commercials and I picked
up audio and took care of files coming out of an Arri Alexa camera. This was my first
time working both in a production and in post with this camera and what comes out
of it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The beauty of the Alexa is Prores 444 files that plays on any modern computer be it
win7 or OSX. It's such a great thing. No transcoding just straight into Premiere Pro
or After Effects. I asked the DP about shooting in RAW but he never do it, only to
PRORES and I understand from a post workflow standpoint that it's much more desirable
and cost effective than RED files or RAW files from the Alexa.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Looking at Blackmagics Cinema Camera due later this summer a couple of things are
shared between this camera and Arris Alexa. Both can shoot to RAW in higher than 2K
resolution or PRORES and both have a high dynamic range in the 13-14 stops class.
I also asked the DP about running audio into the Alexa but he never did that either.
I bet it's easier to get audio into the BMD Cinema Camera but it's also not a priority
it seems in the design of this camera.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
With about the same DR and file format but in 10-bit 4:2:2 on the BMD camera I can
see these camera to look very similar in the edit suit. So it might turn out to be
a poor mans Alexa. Still, footage is lacking except from John Brawley and nobody knows
how easy or cumbersome it will be to shoot with.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The smaller sensor inside the BMD Cinema Camera wont achieve the same amount of shallow
DOF as the Alexa and it wont be as solid but for $2995 I can't see it to turn out
all wrong. Cropfactor compared to Super35 is 1.6. Here's sample footage to view and
I hope that we'll see more soon.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/40584879?title=0&amp;amp;byline=0&amp;amp;portrait=0&amp;amp;color=ffffff" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="640"&gt;
&lt;/iframe&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=be0c0f46-3e5d-4318-8896-3486b7f9fd7f" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Blackmagic Cinema Camera</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=260aa54c-0ed9-4a05-881b-3eb75564ce13</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,260aa54c-0ed9-4a05-881b-3eb75564ce13.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/eos5d3.jpg" border="0" />
        <br />
        <br />
It seems Canon will release a new firmware shortly to remedy things that aren't quite
right in their 5Dmk3. I have at least two bugs that I hope will be released. First
it's my ST-E2 copy from a Chinese manufacture. It triggers the flash remotely but
it doesn't sync the flash with the camera. It works fine on my 5Dmk2 so most definitely
a bug.<br /><br />
Second thing I discovered yesterday and it has to do with when you have an external
LCD screen attached to the HDMI port. The rear LCD screen on the camera should be
blank and not active but using my Zacuto EVF the backlight on the camera body and
its LCD screen was still on. No image or graphics, just the backlight.<br /><br />
Third thing I've noticed is some clips are near impossible to import into Premiere.
This could be related to the interaction between NLE and camera but I've never noticed
this on my 5Dmk2. It could also be a mismatch between the camera and the Sandisk Extreme
Pro card I'm using but I've never had any Sandisk card gone bad in any of my cameras.<br /><br />
The light leak issue was fixed with a piece of tape and we have had one FW update
already. I hope this camera wont continue to show bugs or incompatibility issues and
that Canon will fix these and other bugs. I've heard about new features also but I
suspect they have more to do with making the camera easier by adjusting features already
in the camera.<br /><br />
I'm still very pleased with how still images turn out after I've developed them in
Adobes Lightroom. I did shoot an extensive amount of video test clips but due to Premiere
not ingesting these properly I will hold off any more video shooting with this camera.<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=260aa54c-0ed9-4a05-881b-3eb75564ce13" /></body>
      <title>Canon 5Dmk3 more bugs and fixes?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,260aa54c-0ed9-4a05-881b-3eb75564ce13.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/09/Canon5Dmk3MoreBugsAndFixes.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/eos5d3.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It seems Canon will release a new firmware shortly to remedy things that aren't quite
right in their 5Dmk3. I have at least two bugs that I hope will be released. First
it's my ST-E2 copy from a Chinese manufacture. It triggers the flash remotely but
it doesn't sync the flash with the camera. It works fine on my 5Dmk2 so most definitely
a bug.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Second thing I discovered yesterday and it has to do with when you have an external
LCD screen attached to the HDMI port. The rear LCD screen on the camera should be
blank and not active but using my Zacuto EVF the backlight on the camera body and
its LCD screen was still on. No image or graphics, just the backlight.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Third thing I've noticed is some clips are near impossible to import into Premiere.
This could be related to the interaction between NLE and camera but I've never noticed
this on my 5Dmk2. It could also be a mismatch between the camera and the Sandisk Extreme
Pro card I'm using but I've never had any Sandisk card gone bad in any of my cameras.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The light leak issue was fixed with a piece of tape and we have had one FW update
already. I hope this camera wont continue to show bugs or incompatibility issues and
that Canon will fix these and other bugs. I've heard about new features also but I
suspect they have more to do with making the camera easier by adjusting features already
in the camera.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm still very pleased with how still images turn out after I've developed them in
Adobes Lightroom. I did shoot an extensive amount of video test clips but due to Premiere
not ingesting these properly I will hold off any more video shooting with this camera.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=260aa54c-0ed9-4a05-881b-3eb75564ce13" /&gt;</description>
      <category>5D mkIII</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=7e02687e-d615-46fa-89ff-3feb257c3f45</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,7e02687e-d615-46fa-89ff-3feb257c3f45.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2591.jpg" border="0" height="317" width="640" />
        <br />
        <br />
I fell for Panasonic GF2 as a near perfect camera to bring on a trip or just to bring
during a walk. Small and with good image quality and a camera that is simple to use.
The more I used its touch screen the more I liked it and for once it was fun to just
snap away without planing each shot. A camera like the GF2 invites to this kind of
behaviour and I embraced it.<br /><br />
When the chance came to compare it to the higher spec GX1 from Panasonic I was excited.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2595.jpg" border="0" height="381" width="640" /><br /><br />
Panasonic have three kinds of interchangeable cameras. First the G series that is
aimed towards still shooters. The GH series which leans in the video direction and
the GF series that is the step in model if you come from a compact style camera. The
GX1 is the first in a new line. In a way it's a camera that doesn't know where to
fit in. It's more of an enthusiast camera but lacking in features like an EVF and
full control in video mode. This camera has the same sensor as the G3 camera from
Panasonic and it's a step up from the GF line in image quality.<br /><br />
If I look at the GF1, GF2, GF3 and the soon to come GF5 these cameras have gone in
the direction of shrinking and simplifying things. The GX1 regains features found
in the GF1 and should in a sense be called GF2 because it follows the GF1 in design
and features. I don't like the way the GF3 is to small and lacking hard buttons and
a hot shoe. The GF3 only have a mono microphone and the already small size of these
cameras makes it a bad fit for my hands.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2603.jpg" border="0" height="264" width="640" /><br /><br />
Looking at the back of the GX1 on the right it's obvious it's a larger camera. But
it's also a very similar rear side. The mixture of controlling some features on the
touch screen and some on the mode dial on the GX1 is less than ideal. I like it better
the way it is on the GF2 which is driven more by the touch screen. I also like the
power button better how it's implemented on the GF2.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2605.jpg" border="0" height="174" width="640" /><br /><br />
On the GX1 there's a beefy grip on the right side and it actually makes holding the
camera a little bit more comfortable and grip friendly. In weight the GX1 is a mere
8 grams heavier so to carry it around feels just like the GF2.<br /><br />
Both cameras have a vast amount of features but the GX1 adds things like HDR shooting,
miniature effect, faster fps even 20fps in low rez mode, and when you start to dig
under the hood in the menu system you realize these are both serious cameras. Pretty
much everything can be adjusted. Well, you can't shoot video with all manual control
even thou both cameras has audio meters and when it comes to  audio, four levels
of volume can be set but you still can't use an external microphone like on a GH1/2.<br /><br />
I think both cameras are great but when it comes to image quality the GX1 has higher
resolution and better ISO capabilities. They are not far apart but no doubt GX1 is
the better camera. I only miss the simplicity of the GF2 because it collects almost
everything on the excellent touch screen. There's no problem seeing outdoors in sunlight
but due to your fingers touching the screen it will be a screen full of fingerprints
and grease.<br /><br />
The GX1 has a 16MP sensor but when you shoot in 3:2 which I like to do you'll use
less of the sensor. I wish all m4/3 from Panasonic used the multi aspect sensor like
they do in the GH1 and GH2 cameras.<br /><p></p><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/P1000861.jpg" border="0" height="371" width="640" /><br /><i><font size="2">Panasonic GX1 + Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 25/1.4</font></i><br /><br />
With a camera like a GF or GX series camera you really should take advantage of shooting
RAW. A small camera can only do so much in camera, in real time so JPEG images will
be a compromise. To not use RAW is a shame. These two cameras are both excellent at
what they do and I rather have either around my neck than lets say my Canon 5Dmk3
when out for a walk or travelling light.<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=7e02687e-d615-46fa-89ff-3feb257c3f45" /></body>
      <title>Panasonic GX1 vs GF2</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,7e02687e-d615-46fa-89ff-3feb257c3f45.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/07/PanasonicGX1VsGF2.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2591.jpg" border="0" height="317" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I fell for Panasonic GF2 as a near perfect camera to bring on a trip or just to bring
during a walk. Small and with good image quality and a camera that is simple to use.
The more I used its touch screen the more I liked it and for once it was fun to just
snap away without planing each shot. A camera like the GF2 invites to this kind of
behaviour and I embraced it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When the chance came to compare it to the higher spec GX1 from Panasonic I was excited.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2595.jpg" border="0" height="381" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Panasonic have three kinds of interchangeable cameras. First the G series that is
aimed towards still shooters. The GH series which leans in the video direction and
the GF series that is the step in model if you come from a compact style camera. The
GX1 is the first in a new line. In a way it's a camera that doesn't know where to
fit in. It's more of an enthusiast camera but lacking in features like an EVF and
full control in video mode. This camera has the same sensor as the G3 camera from
Panasonic and it's a step up from the GF line in image quality.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If I look at the GF1, GF2, GF3 and the soon to come GF5 these cameras have gone in
the direction of shrinking and simplifying things. The GX1 regains features found
in the GF1 and should in a sense be called GF2 because it follows the GF1 in design
and features. I don't like the way the GF3 is to small and lacking hard buttons and
a hot shoe. The GF3 only have a mono microphone and the already small size of these
cameras makes it a bad fit for my hands.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2603.jpg" border="0" height="264" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Looking at the back of the GX1 on the right it's obvious it's a larger camera. But
it's also a very similar rear side. The mixture of controlling some features on the
touch screen and some on the mode dial on the GX1 is less than ideal. I like it better
the way it is on the GF2 which is driven more by the touch screen. I also like the
power button better how it's implemented on the GF2.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2605.jpg" border="0" height="174" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the GX1 there's a beefy grip on the right side and it actually makes holding the
camera a little bit more comfortable and grip friendly. In weight the GX1 is a mere
8 grams heavier so to carry it around feels just like the GF2.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Both cameras have a vast amount of features but the GX1 adds things like HDR shooting,
miniature effect, faster fps even 20fps in low rez mode, and when you start to dig
under the hood in the menu system you realize these are both serious cameras. Pretty
much everything can be adjusted. Well, you can't shoot video with all manual control
even thou both cameras has audio meters and when it comes to&amp;nbsp; audio, four levels
of volume can be set but you still can't use an external microphone like on a GH1/2.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think both cameras are great but when it comes to image quality the GX1 has higher
resolution and better ISO capabilities. They are not far apart but no doubt GX1 is
the better camera. I only miss the simplicity of the GF2 because it collects almost
everything on the excellent touch screen. There's no problem seeing outdoors in sunlight
but due to your fingers touching the screen it will be a screen full of fingerprints
and grease.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The GX1 has a 16MP sensor but when you shoot in 3:2 which I like to do you'll use
less of the sensor. I wish all m4/3 from Panasonic used the multi aspect sensor like
they do in the GH1 and GH2 cameras.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/P1000861.jpg" border="0" height="371" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;font size="2"&gt;Panasonic GX1 + Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 25/1.4&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
With a camera like a GF or GX series camera you really should take advantage of shooting
RAW. A small camera can only do so much in camera, in real time so JPEG images will
be a compromise. To not use RAW is a shame. These two cameras are both excellent at
what they do and I rather have either around my neck than lets say my Canon 5Dmk3
when out for a walk or travelling light.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=7e02687e-d615-46fa-89ff-3feb257c3f45" /&gt;</description>
      <category>GF2</category>
      <category>GX1</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=95bb2ed6-9f05-4a9f-914e-e3a32a797928</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,95bb2ed6-9f05-4a9f-914e-e3a32a797928.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/P1010027.jpg" border="0" height="406" width="640" />
        <br />
        <br />
This weekend me and a couple of friends made a short feature and I went with a full
rig and my AF101. Often I strip the camera down to just the camera and lens but this
time I wanted everything to stay on the rig since we had to move outdoors and indoors
swiftly. All in all 12 camera positions in a day and it was fun to see this project
materialize after having worked on it since last summer.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/_1010036.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640" /><br /><br />
One of the key tools I used was my <a href="http://www.smallhd.com/Products/DP6-discount-bundles.html">SmallHD
DP6</a>. Great outdoors with the included hood. At first I didn't like it but now
I think it works just fine and I never have any problem to see what I'm shooting even
in direct sunlight midday. Two NP-FV100 lasted most of the day and then I switched
to my second pair. I had some problems with the HD-SDI port on my DP6 and the day
before shooting I did another test run on equipment to determinate if I would have
to go with the HDMI port instead.<br /><br />
I found out that the BNC cables I used and the connectors attached to them didn't
provide a snuggle enough fit so when I used a BNC T-adapter it worked flawless.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/P1010026.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640" /><br /><br />
I also used my <a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/Cinematics-HDDSLR-Matte-Box-4-4-Filter-Trays-for-15mm-Rod-5DMKII-7D-60D-550D-/260852197842?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&amp;hash=item3cbc00a9d2">Cinematics
mattebox</a> and the top flag and of course my <a href="http://atomos.com/samurai/">Atomos
Samurai</a> Prores recorder. There's a software/hardware bug on the Samurai which
I've notified Atomos about and you can run into it under certain situations. As far
as I've concluded the Samurai settings for 1080i/p, Prores quality and the SDI trigger
is reset if you go into playback mode run a couple of clips and then go back to normal/record
mode. Then these settings are reset but it doesn't happen every time. Most of the
times it works as it should be, but eventually it will reset the settings.<br /><br />
I suspect that if you are running from the second battery the Samurai switched back
to the first battery when you switch to normal/record mode and sometimes there's a
power glitch that resets the unit. Not fun when you have set up triggers and Prores
quality. let's hope Atomos will solve this in the next firmware. Other than this got
reset once during the day the Samurai worked like a champ.<br /><br />
The Cinematics mattebox is a nice one with removable flags in all directions. Solid
with two 4x4 filter holders. I think the last time I used a follow focus was a year
ago and I think it's one of the most overrated things you can buy. It looks cool but
with my shooting style I hardly ever need it.<br />
 <br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/_1010034.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640" /><br /><br />
I used two rails and one cross rail to attach the DP6 on the left side of the camera.
The setup with three screens active is great. The LCD on the AF101 is used to display
WFM, the DP6 is my reference monitor and the director can use the screen on the Samurai.
Not in broad daylight thou because the Samurai screen is to dim.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/_1010049.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
The rig rested on my <a href="http://www.sachtler.com/en/products/camera-support/fluid-heads/product_fluid-heads-75-mm_fsb-8.html">Sacthler
FSB8</a> head and this is one great video head. Loving it. I have some mixed feelings
about the <a href="http://www.manfrotto.com/art-pro-carbon-fibre-video-tripod">Manfrotto
542ART</a> tripod but until something that is better for a decent amount of money
comes along I'll keep using it. It's no bad but not in the same league as the FSB8.<br /><br />
It's always good to have a full rig and use the stuff you like to use instead of fitting
equipment into a budget and it's always fun making videos with friends!<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=95bb2ed6-9f05-4a9f-914e-e3a32a797928" /></body>
      <title>Making a short with the AF101</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,95bb2ed6-9f05-4a9f-914e-e3a32a797928.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/05/01/MakingAShortWithTheAF101.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/P1010027.jpg" border="0" height="406" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This weekend me and a couple of friends made a short feature and I went with a full
rig and my AF101. Often I strip the camera down to just the camera and lens but this
time I wanted everything to stay on the rig since we had to move outdoors and indoors
swiftly. All in all 12 camera positions in a day and it was fun to see this project
materialize after having worked on it since last summer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/_1010036.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of the key tools I used was my &lt;a href="http://www.smallhd.com/Products/DP6-discount-bundles.html"&gt;SmallHD
DP6&lt;/a&gt;. Great outdoors with the included hood. At first I didn't like it but now
I think it works just fine and I never have any problem to see what I'm shooting even
in direct sunlight midday. Two NP-FV100 lasted most of the day and then I switched
to my second pair. I had some problems with the HD-SDI port on my DP6 and the day
before shooting I did another test run on equipment to determinate if I would have
to go with the HDMI port instead.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I found out that the BNC cables I used and the connectors attached to them didn't
provide a snuggle enough fit so when I used a BNC T-adapter it worked flawless.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/P1010026.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I also used my &lt;a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/Cinematics-HDDSLR-Matte-Box-4-4-Filter-Trays-for-15mm-Rod-5DMKII-7D-60D-550D-/260852197842?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&amp;amp;hash=item3cbc00a9d2"&gt;Cinematics
mattebox&lt;/a&gt; and the top flag and of course my &lt;a href="http://atomos.com/samurai/"&gt;Atomos
Samurai&lt;/a&gt; Prores recorder. There's a software/hardware bug on the Samurai which
I've notified Atomos about and you can run into it under certain situations. As far
as I've concluded the Samurai settings for 1080i/p, Prores quality and the SDI trigger
is reset if you go into playback mode run a couple of clips and then go back to normal/record
mode. Then these settings are reset but it doesn't happen every time. Most of the
times it works as it should be, but eventually it will reset the settings.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I suspect that if you are running from the second battery the Samurai switched back
to the first battery when you switch to normal/record mode and sometimes there's a
power glitch that resets the unit. Not fun when you have set up triggers and Prores
quality. let's hope Atomos will solve this in the next firmware. Other than this got
reset once during the day the Samurai worked like a champ.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Cinematics mattebox is a nice one with removable flags in all directions. Solid
with two 4x4 filter holders. I think the last time I used a follow focus was a year
ago and I think it's one of the most overrated things you can buy. It looks cool but
with my shooting style I hardly ever need it.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/_1010034.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I used two rails and one cross rail to attach the DP6 on the left side of the camera.
The setup with three screens active is great. The LCD on the AF101 is used to display
WFM, the DP6 is my reference monitor and the director can use the screen on the Samurai.
Not in broad daylight thou because the Samurai screen is to dim.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/_1010049.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The rig rested on my &lt;a href="http://www.sachtler.com/en/products/camera-support/fluid-heads/product_fluid-heads-75-mm_fsb-8.html"&gt;Sacthler
FSB8&lt;/a&gt; head and this is one great video head. Loving it. I have some mixed feelings
about the &lt;a href="http://www.manfrotto.com/art-pro-carbon-fibre-video-tripod"&gt;Manfrotto
542ART&lt;/a&gt; tripod but until something that is better for a decent amount of money
comes along I'll keep using it. It's no bad but not in the same league as the FSB8.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's always good to have a full rig and use the stuff you like to use instead of fitting
equipment into a budget and it's always fun making videos with friends!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=95bb2ed6-9f05-4a9f-914e-e3a32a797928" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Panasonic AG-AF100/101</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=b7ed771f-71aa-48c6-adef-cc08d1253c4b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,b7ed771f-71aa-48c6-adef-cc08d1253c4b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I attended Canon Pro Solution in Stockholm
today and got the chance to both talk to Canon representatives and use cameras and
lenses. The most interesting camera was of course the EOS 1D C 4k shooter.<br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/canonEOS1Dc[1].jpg" border="0" height="640" width="640" /><br /><br />
Peter Yabsley held an EOS Cinema presentation and talked about what each camera in
their line fit in production. The C300 and the 1D C were also present to experience
first hand but no C500 in sight. I found it interesting that the C300 and C500 share
the same sensor and that the C500 uses more of the available pixels to achieve 4k.
The C500 can't record internal 4k and has to rely on an external recorder feed by
two 3G SDI connections.<br /><br />
In higher frame rates than 60fps the camera does something they called half RAW but
what is that? Well, the resolution vertically is only half that of normal 4k <span class="st"><em>4096</em> ×
2048. So in half RAW the recorded resolution is <i>4096x1080</i> up to 120fps.<br /><br />
I got a chance to get to know the C300 a bit more and I felt it's a nicely built camera
and without the hand grip was comfortable to use. I didn't care much for the hand
grip it just felt awkward to use the buttons on the hand grip.<br /><br />
Far more interesting was to see and use the EOS 1D C. At first glance this camera
seems just to expensive and talking to Peter </span>Yabsley <span class="st">he said
that most people he talked to pointed out the high price tag and that it was just
to high, as the first thing to say about this camera. In it's form it's a 1D X and
it shares the same functionality as the 1D X except it lacks one port that's on the
1D X but then it also has a headphone jack.<br /><br />
I also learned that the 4k in camera recording probably does not provide for any type
of in camera playback of the recorded 4k video. 1080p up to 60p is supported and since
it's H264 just like in the 5Dmk3 and 1D X playback works for these kind of files.
The solution to this, according to Peter from Canon, is to use an external proxy recorder
via the HDMI output and use it as a playback device/function. He was unsure about
timecode on the HDMI output to keep external recorded files and the 4k files lined
up. The 4k files from the internal CF card has to be converted in a program provided
by Canon that can generate files like 4k DNG and smaller ones for proxy use. I still
think it's exciting to have 4k internal recording and speaking of price of the 1D
C if you consider what you'll get it's actually much more sensible. I got the figure
10.000 EURO for the camera and you look at it this way. You get a 1D X, the flag ship
DSLR from Canon with all the functions, you get a 4k internal CF card video camera
with a APS-H sensor size which is larger than super35, you'll also get 1080p50/60
and the ability to shoot 1080 in either full frame, APS-H and super35. Your lens collection
just become much more useful!<br /><br />
The 1D C is 24p only and that's a downer for us European users. The answer in short
I got was that if there's a demand and if it's feasible we'll get 25p. 
<br /><br />
We also talked about Blackmagic Designs Cinema Camera and he looked upon it with a
curious interest on where it will fit in and at the same time felt it was good to
have someone shaking things up. He also agreed there's a big leap price wise from
the 5Dmk3 to the C300 or even the 1D C and that Canon probably will follow customers
wishes further on. He also pointed out that in a short period of time Canon have a
whole new division and soon three cinema cameras in the open with C300/C500 and 1D
C. It's understandable Canon will concentrate on these first before going for a lower
priced C-type camera.<br /><br />
Speaking of the Blackmagic Cinema Camera. I heard a surprisingly large number have
already been putting in an order for the BMD Cinema Camera here in Sweden so I fear
they wont be able to deliver to us all in the first batch or so. I also got a little
insight in sales of the DaVinci Resolve software and it's apparently not selling as
well as Blackmagic would like. Another reason to make this camera - to sell or involve
more people in their software.<br /><br />
Blackmagic have a history of buying other company on the verge of going bankrupt and
with their excellent software skills make these already developed products a more
user-friendly interface and interaction with the user. All heard on the show floor...<br /><br />
I also got a chance to talk with a service engineer about the light leak and he opened
up a 5Dmk2 body and showed me where the light sensor is located and that virtually
all Canon cameras can have the light leak issue that some fear the 5Dmk3 suffers from.
In the real world and used as one uses a DSLR this is a non-issue or at least no bigger
issue that on any other Canon DSLR.<br /><br />
In the EOS movie both hey also had the now "old" XF series camcorders and the XF100/105
is a sweet little camera compared to the XA10 and XF305. Small, lightweight, and with
the features that matter. I got the impression that the XF305 is a very good camera
with an excellent lens but somehow in this room it just felt ancient.<br /><br />
I played with Canons G1X but compared to something like my Panasonic GF2 it was, in
my opinion, a lesser camera than the GF series and much more expensive. The viewfinder
was so tiny it was a joke! It's just a strange looking camera. 
<br /><br />
Present were a couple of DSLR rigs but to be honest these also start to feel so last
year. I haven't shot any video with my 5Dmk3 and I really have no interest in doing
that. Love it for the stills but video in this camera is just boring.<br /></span><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=b7ed771f-71aa-48c6-adef-cc08d1253c4b" /></body>
      <title>Canon Pro Solutions in Stockholm 2012</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,b7ed771f-71aa-48c6-adef-cc08d1253c4b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/04/25/CanonProSolutionsInStockholm2012.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:16:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>I attended Canon Pro Solution in Stockholm today and got the chance to both talk to Canon representatives and use cameras and lenses. The most interesting camera was of course the EOS 1D C 4k shooter.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/canonEOS1Dc[1].jpg" border="0" height="640" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Peter Yabsley held an EOS Cinema presentation and talked about what each camera in
their line fit in production. The C300 and the 1D C were also present to experience
first hand but no C500 in sight. I found it interesting that the C300 and C500 share
the same sensor and that the C500 uses more of the available pixels to achieve 4k.
The C500 can't record internal 4k and has to rely on an external recorder feed by
two 3G SDI connections.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In higher frame rates than 60fps the camera does something they called half RAW but
what is that? Well, the resolution vertically is only half that of normal 4k &lt;span class="st"&gt;&lt;em&gt;4096&lt;/em&gt; ×
2048. So in half RAW the recorded resolution is &lt;i&gt;4096x1080&lt;/i&gt; up to 120fps.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I got a chance to get to know the C300 a bit more and I felt it's a nicely built camera
and without the hand grip was comfortable to use. I didn't care much for the hand
grip it just felt awkward to use the buttons on the hand grip.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Far more interesting was to see and use the EOS 1D C. At first glance this camera
seems just to expensive and talking to Peter &lt;/span&gt;Yabsley &lt;span class="st"&gt;he said
that most people he talked to pointed out the high price tag and that it was just
to high, as the first thing to say about this camera. In it's form it's a 1D X and
it shares the same functionality as the 1D X except it lacks one port that's on the
1D X but then it also has a headphone jack.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I also learned that the 4k in camera recording probably does not provide for any type
of in camera playback of the recorded 4k video. 1080p up to 60p is supported and since
it's H264 just like in the 5Dmk3 and 1D X playback works for these kind of files.
The solution to this, according to Peter from Canon, is to use an external proxy recorder
via the HDMI output and use it as a playback device/function. He was unsure about
timecode on the HDMI output to keep external recorded files and the 4k files lined
up. The 4k files from the internal CF card has to be converted in a program provided
by Canon that can generate files like 4k DNG and smaller ones for proxy use. I still
think it's exciting to have 4k internal recording and speaking of price of the 1D
C if you consider what you'll get it's actually much more sensible. I got the figure
10.000 EURO for the camera and you look at it this way. You get a 1D X, the flag ship
DSLR from Canon with all the functions, you get a 4k internal CF card video camera
with a APS-H sensor size which is larger than super35, you'll also get 1080p50/60
and the ability to shoot 1080 in either full frame, APS-H and super35. Your lens collection
just become much more useful!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The 1D C is 24p only and that's a downer for us European users. The answer in short
I got was that if there's a demand and if it's feasible we'll get 25p. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We also talked about Blackmagic Designs Cinema Camera and he looked upon it with a
curious interest on where it will fit in and at the same time felt it was good to
have someone shaking things up. He also agreed there's a big leap price wise from
the 5Dmk3 to the C300 or even the 1D C and that Canon probably will follow customers
wishes further on. He also pointed out that in a short period of time Canon have a
whole new division and soon three cinema cameras in the open with C300/C500 and 1D
C. It's understandable Canon will concentrate on these first before going for a lower
priced C-type camera.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Speaking of the Blackmagic Cinema Camera. I heard a surprisingly large number have
already been putting in an order for the BMD Cinema Camera here in Sweden so I fear
they wont be able to deliver to us all in the first batch or so. I also got a little
insight in sales of the DaVinci Resolve software and it's apparently not selling as
well as Blackmagic would like. Another reason to make this camera - to sell or involve
more people in their software.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Blackmagic have a history of buying other company on the verge of going bankrupt and
with their excellent software skills make these already developed products a more
user-friendly interface and interaction with the user. All heard on the show floor...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I also got a chance to talk with a service engineer about the light leak and he opened
up a 5Dmk2 body and showed me where the light sensor is located and that virtually
all Canon cameras can have the light leak issue that some fear the 5Dmk3 suffers from.
In the real world and used as one uses a DSLR this is a non-issue or at least no bigger
issue that on any other Canon DSLR.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the EOS movie both hey also had the now "old" XF series camcorders and the XF100/105
is a sweet little camera compared to the XA10 and XF305. Small, lightweight, and with
the features that matter. I got the impression that the XF305 is a very good camera
with an excellent lens but somehow in this room it just felt ancient.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I played with Canons G1X but compared to something like my Panasonic GF2 it was, in
my opinion, a lesser camera than the GF series and much more expensive. The viewfinder
was so tiny it was a joke! It's just a strange looking camera. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Present were a couple of DSLR rigs but to be honest these also start to feel so last
year. I haven't shot any video with my 5Dmk3 and I really have no interest in doing
that. Love it for the stills but video in this camera is just boring.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=b7ed771f-71aa-48c6-adef-cc08d1253c4b" /&gt;</description>
      <category>1D C</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://theeditman.com/blogg/Trackback.aspx?guid=b581ebb3-1953-421d-a1ef-379d824e2e31</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://theeditman.com/blogg/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,b581ebb3-1953-421d-a1ef-379d824e2e31.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>theeditman</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/IMG_4968.jpg" border="0" height="515" width="640" />
        <br />
        <br />
I already have two Canon Speedlite 580EX II and two different IR/RF system to trigger
them but saw a way to simplify this by getting two of Canons brand new Speedlite 600EX-RT.<br /><br />
These are even more weather sealed than the 580EX II and they can be controlled by
IR and RF up to 30 meters. They also communicate both ways so the slave flash can
send info to the master flash.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2201.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640" /><br /><br />
I had the option to go for one ST-E3 controller but felt I could make more use of
two flashes, one mounted on the camera and one as slave inside one of my softboxes.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2204.jpg" border="0" height="299" width="640" /><br /><br />
It's easy to set up communication. Pretty much select one as slave and one as master
and the "Link" LED will signal with a green light.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2200.jpg" border="0" height="549" width="640" /><br /><br />
The menu has been updated and feels alot better than on the older flash units. Even
the LCD display is bigger and when you press a button the LCD get lit.<br /><br /><img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2206.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br />
Canon has put more features like supporting focal length up to 200m, a filter holder
and two filters included to better cope with warmer lights, the AF assist beam now
supports 61-point AF system and  many other enhancements.<br /><br />
Overall a good update from the 580EX II. The 600EX-RT is also a bit more powerful
and supports high speed syncing. Great to provide fill outdoors and it feels more
solid. The 600EX-RT is more expensive but at the same time it makes it easier to use
two flashes in any location.<br /><a href=""></a><img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=b581ebb3-1953-421d-a1ef-379d824e2e31" /></body>
      <title>Dual Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://theeditman.com/blogg/PermaLink,guid,b581ebb3-1953-421d-a1ef-379d824e2e31.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://theeditman.com/blogg/2012/04/22/DualCanonSpeedlite600EXRT.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/IMG_4968.jpg" border="0" height="515" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I already have two Canon Speedlite 580EX II and two different IR/RF system to trigger
them but saw a way to simplify this by getting two of Canons brand new Speedlite 600EX-RT.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
These are even more weather sealed than the 580EX II and they can be controlled by
IR and RF up to 30 meters. They also communicate both ways so the slave flash can
send info to the master flash.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2201.jpg" border="0" height="427" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I had the option to go for one ST-E3 controller but felt I could make more use of
two flashes, one mounted on the camera and one as slave inside one of my softboxes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2204.jpg" border="0" height="299" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's easy to set up communication. Pretty much select one as slave and one as master
and the "Link" LED will signal with a green light.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2200.jpg" border="0" height="549" width="640"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The menu has been updated and feels alot better than on the older flash units. Even
the LCD display is bigger and when you press a button the LCD get lit.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/content/binary/LPL_2206.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Canon has put more features like supporting focal length up to 200m, a filter holder
and two filters included to better cope with warmer lights, the AF assist beam now
supports 61-point AF system and&amp;nbsp; many other enhancements.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Overall a good update from the 580EX II. The 600EX-RT is also a bit more powerful
and supports high speed syncing. Great to provide fill outdoors and it feels more
solid. The 600EX-RT is more expensive but at the same time it makes it easier to use
two flashes in any location.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://theeditman.com/blogg/aggbug.ashx?id=b581ebb3-1953-421d-a1ef-379d824e2e31" /&gt;</description>
      <category>5D mkII</category>
      <category>5D mkIII</category>
      <category>Stills</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
